The truth

During the Six-Day War, Israel attacked and nearly sank the USS Liberty belonging to its closest ally, the USA. Thirty-four American servicemen were killed in the two-hour assault by Israeli warplanes and torpedo boats. Israel claimed that the whole affair had been a tragic accident based on mistaken identification of the ship. The American government accepted the explanation. For more than 30 years many people have disbelieved the official explanation but have been unable to rebut it convincingly. Now, Dead in the Water uses startling new evidence to reveal the truth behind the seemingly inexplicable attack. The film combines dramatic reconstruction of the events, with new access to former officers in the US and Israeli armed forces and intelligence services who have decided to give their own version of events. Interviews include President Lyndon Johnson's Secretary of Defence Robert McNamara, former head of the Israeli navy Admiral Shlomo Errell and members of the USS Liberty crew.
New evidence shows that the September 11th activities of former President George W. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld were falsely reported by official sources.

The 20-member 9/11 Consensus Panel analyzed evidence from press reports, FOIA requests, and archived 9/11 Commission file documents to produce eight new studies, released today.

The international Panel also discovered that four massive aerial practice exercises traditionally held in October were in full operation on 9/11. The largest, Global Guardian, held annually by NORAD and the US Strategic and Space Commands, had originally been scheduled for October 22-31 but was moved, along with Vigilant Guardian, to early September.


http://911truth.org/

"Impossible"

     On September 11, 2001 America was attacked by "Alqaeda." On the morning of the attacks four air planes with American passangers were hijacked by terroists, flew into the twin towers. at the wrold trade center of NY.  This resulted in the destruction of the twin towers and the deaths of thousands.  The third plane flew into the pentagon.  This crash caused damage to the pentagon building.  The funny thing here is that the plane crashed into the most unimportant part of the pentagon.  Their was no officials or any important people in that section.  That part of the pentagon was under construction.  Then the third set of attacks occured, but the passangers somehow were able to take over the "terroists" and have the plane crash land into a field not causing any serious damage.  This was extremley ironic because the governement told us that the passangers got word of the other attacks and were cautious for theirs.  this can not be possible because passangers did not have phones and the ones who did were not able to access them to get information from anywhere in the world.  So in conclusion it was impossible for them to know about the other attacks, let alone any information from outside the plane.  The governement told us that the hijacker on the plane to the twin towers had training in florida for one month, with a small private plane.  Now tell me how is it possible for this man with minimal training take over a jumbo jet and override the GPS system on the plane to re-direct it's route into the towers.  This is actually impossible and the givernement has been feeding us lies. 

Demolition

                 Why I think 9/11 is conspiracy is simply because I disagree that the attackers were perpetrated by Al-Qaeda.  Clear evidence of these attacks was overlooked.  I believe that the 9/11 attacks on the Twin towers was a result in controlled demolition.  It came down like it was destroyed using weapons like TNT.  Both buildings came straight down.  They did not top over like the architect if the building made them to do.  In a short clip recorded we could see the plane near the tower but the tower already has caught fire.  I believe that the government set this up and needed someone to blame.  Who else rather than the terrorist group Al-Qaeda.  The government needed to destroy those buildings, reason being not so clear as to why they wanted it destroyed but it did.  

"Accounts"

            Street accounts of other firemen and civilians include being rushed out of the area after the sound of secondary explosions emerging from ground level. After the third major explosion was heard on each building, they would come down. A rescued citizen stated “At 10:30 I tried to leave the building, but as I got outside I heard a second explosion… And then a fire marshal came in and said we had to leave because if there was a third explosion this building might not last”. In another account, that of Edmund McNally’s phone call to his wife Liz, he tells his wife “Liz, this was a terrorist attack. I can hear the explosions below me”. Survivors Tom Elliot and Kim White state to have heard explosions above and below them as they were being rescued, and as a result they had to escape through the stair wells.

            Other theories suggest that the collapse of the twin towers had to be a result of controlled demolitions, as the building was built in three sections. This means that when the tower collapsed, only the affected part was supposed to have come down and it would have fallen freely towards the ground into several buildings in that area. The buildings were constructed two strong to be brought down like that, and the only way for them to collapse straight down the way they did would be for an explosion to take place at the bottom to weaken the building, and then followed by smaller explosions which would bring the building down piece by piece. 

"Bombs on Board Towers"

        One of the biggest 911 conspiracy theories to date is that of controlled demolitions. Many people believe that the media was feeding us lies, all part of a cover up to hide the truth about explosives placed in the building beforehand. The planes were just the cover-up, a diversion made so that we would be distracted from the detonating explosives. This theory was heavily advocated by people such as physicist Steven E. Jones, architect Richard Gage, software engineer Jim Hoffman, and theologian David Ray Griffin. They fuel their argument with the basis that the National Institute of Standards and Technology continued to reinforce their theory about the impact of the jets being what caused the buildings to fall, yet they never made tests or allowed tests to be made on active thermite material discovered in debris, which could have been the result of an explosion.

            Many personal accounts of this incident, including phone calls, video tapes, and written accounts, all concur with the idea that a secondary explosion was heard. Many people state they witnessed gushes of smoke leaving the building in parts the plane did not impact, and these could have been the results of squibs, smaller explosives made to set off a bigger one. People that were in the basement of the north and south tower, and firefighters near the area, also reported having heard multiple explosions after the plane had crashed, which seemed to be the result of a secondary device. The biggest “explosion” heard, apparently came from the basements of both buildings, and as a result, great dust clouds emerged from the bottom of both towers. Some firemen are also expected to have been aware of the situation, as there is video evidence of firefighter chiefs instructing their men to not enter the tower as there were bombs inside, and accounts of people being told by firemen such as Lieutenant and Auxiliary Officer Paul Isaac Jr. stated “many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the “higher ups” forbid discussion of this fact”.